AI displacement pressure
7%
Low RiskChild/After school care centre worker
Child/After school care centre worker has 20% AI task overlap and 47% human bottleneck protection — lower risk than 69% of occupations in the live market. Current AI capabilities have limited overlap with core tasks.
Why This Score
20% of tasks overlap with current AI
47% human advantage from judgment & presence
67% demand buffer from the local labour market
AI usage 9pp above theoretical exposure
These factors interact with each other — the final score is not a simple sum of these bars.
How much AI overlaps with this job's tasks, offset by human advantages and local demand. Score stability: watch. How this works
Tasks AI can handle
With 20% AI task overlap (based on Felten AIOE, Anthropic Economic Index, Eloundou GPT exposure, and ILO occupational exposure), the Child/After school care centre worker tasks most exposed include: reservation management, menu recommendations, order processing, loyalty program tracking, and basic customer query handling via chatbots.
What AI can't do here
At 47% human bottleneck protection, the tasks that remain hardest to automate for Child/After school care centre worker include: genuine hospitality and warmth, reading customer moods, handling complaints gracefully, creating memorable experiences, and adapting service to cultural expectations.
Skills to focus on
Brynjolfsson et al. (2023) found customer service agents using AI saw +14% productivity, with the biggest gains among junior workers — AI compressed the experience gap.
Sources: Felten AIOE (2021), Anthropic Economic Index (2026), Eloundou GPT Exposure (2023), ILO GenAI (2025), Pizzinelli et al. bottleneck model. Full methodology.
Role profile
How this role's work breaks down across key dimensions. This is a general profile, not an individual measurement.
Workflow dimensions (0 = low, 1 = high)
Singapore Now
Current labour market conditions and how they affect this role.
Cooling, but not collapsing. Vacancies are softer, yet retrenchment remains low and hiring still exceeds resignations.
Vacancy
3.1%
↓ 11.4% YoY
Hiring
2.6%
vs 1.6% resign
Retrenchment
1.5
per 1,000 · low
Re-entry
78.5%
find work in 12mo· -1.6pp
Clerical, Sales & Service Workers · 2025 Q4
Top Industries
Industry vacancy overlays use the latest published detailed cross-tab, which can lag the main labour monitor.
How this changes by career stage
Senior workers benefit from institutional knowledge and judgment that AI cannot replicate. Entry-level roles have higher task overlap with AI.
What You Can Do
Child/After school care centre worker has some offset potential, but it depends on transition pathways holding up in practice and on workers clearing the main switching frictions.
Published transition support
Related roles you could transition to
Similarity-basedCompare within Service & Sales Workers
See how this compares to similar occupations
Compare with... →Classification
Higher risk than 31% of occupations
Raw scores
AIOE -0.384 · θ 0.670 · C-AIOE -0.313
Stability
watch · Optimistic 4% · Pessimistic 11%
Score range (best/worst case)
Exposure 15–25% · Net risk 4.90–9.01%
Scoring basis
Not published. No scoring-basis metadata is available for this occupation.
Wage range (SGD/mo)
25th 1,750 · Median 2,648 · 75th 4,373
Evidence & sources
Data matching
direct · SSOC 53113
Real-world AI usage: +9% vs estimated
Data quality
86% · Matching 1.00 · Market data 0.65 · Freshness 0.84
Task-weighted shadow evidence is not active for this occupation yet.
AI overlap by data source
Weights: aioe 24% · anthropic 26% · eloundou 25% · ilo 26%
Tools & offset factors
What helps
- Nearby moves and published transition support look reasonably strong.
What could slow it down
- Current demand support is thin, so offsets may take longer to show up.
Worker profile & local context
- Vacancy rate is 3.1% and fell by 0.2 points from last quarter.
- Hiring read: recruitment is running above resignation (2.6% vs 1.6%).
- Retrenchment was low at 1.5 per 1,000 employees.
- 78.5% of retrenched workers re-entered employment within 12 months.
Worker profile
Gender mix
15% male / 85% femalePublished Singapore worker composition for the detailed occupation family 53 Personal Care Workers.
Employment structure
Employee-heavy91% employees, 9% employers or self-employed workers.
Work arrangement
Part-time meaningful24% part-time and 76% full-time in 2025.
Age profile
Older-skewing17% aged 15 to 29, 32% aged 30 to 49, and 51% aged 50 or older.
Qualification mix
Non-degree heavySecondary 26%; Post-secondary 25%.
Where this work is concentrated
Top planning areas
Woodlands, Tampines, Yishun22% of workers in this occupation group live in these three planning areas.
Residential concentration
Moderately clustered35% live across the top five planning areas in the 2020 Census.
Commute pattern
Mid-range commutesEstimated average commute 33.8 minutes. 28% take 46 minutes or more.
Frequently asked questions
Will AI replace Child/After school care centre worker?
Child/After school care centre worker has 20% AI task overlap and 47% human bottleneck protection — lower risk than 69% of occupations in the live market. Current AI capabilities have limited overlap with core tasks. Net displacement risk: 7% (Low). Median wage: SGD 2,648/month.
What is the AI risk score for Child/After school care centre worker?
Child/After school care centre worker has an AI displacement risk of 7%, rated Low. AI task overlap: 20%. Human advantage: 47%. Local demand buffer: 67%.
What career transitions are available for Child/After school care centre worker?
Child/After school care centre worker has modeled transition pathways to related occupations. The strongest adjacent pathway is Educarer, based on skill and wage similarity (model-estimated). Transition scoring accounts for wage preservation, training ease, and destination quality.
How does Child/After school care centre worker salary compare in the live market?
Child/After school care centre worker earns a median gross wage of SGD 2,648/month in the live market (25th-75th percentile: SGD 1,750-4,373). This is 41% below median across all 562 scored occupations, and 11% below group median within Service & Sales Workers occupations.